[ Add Tags ]
Previous Page [ 1 | 2 ] |
[ Return to Politics | Reply to Topic ] |
No_Heros | Posted: Jun 04, 2010 - 19:17 |
| ||||
Level: 0 CS Original | CT's develope from something that is not there in the first place or things that are speculated because the information is not given to the public. It is then left to the public to concive a theory without all proof. In the case of the federal reserve I feel very strongly they are way to secrative. 1 example is from here, sure you have seen it before. | |||||
#31 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
scitops | Posted: Jun 04, 2010 - 21:54 |
| ||||
Level: 4 CS Original | I believe most people believe Lew Rockwell wrote the newsletters. I believe Rockwell is Paul's brain. | |||||
#32 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
casey | Posted: Jun 04, 2010 - 23:01 |
| ||||
Level: 0 CS Original | half a trillion dollars and you dont know who got the money?? lol lmfao!! you couldnt write this stuff!! | |||||
#33 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
No_Heros | Posted: Jun 08, 2010 - 22:09 |
| ||||
Level: 0 CS Original | Is it because the way zeitgeist portrayed the federal reserve that you think the institution of it was not a conspiracy of sorts? I'm just wondering how much of these extreme conspiracies lead into a kind of CT vs Debunker black and white thinking pattern and entraped by false dichotomies. | |||||
#34 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Previous Page [ 1 | 2 ] |