Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Going to give CJ a second chance... - Page 2

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to Politics | Reply to Topic ]
Sil the ShillPosted: Aug 03, 2010 - 17:31
(0)
 

Level: 9
CS Original

Nanos just really doesn't like fat people it seems.

#31 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Aug 03, 2010 - 17:37
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Self loathing is a bitch.

#32 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Aug 03, 2010 - 18:09
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> when you are just some damn kid with a big mouth.

FX [ Almost starts to wonder what Matt is.. ]

Or it could be indicative of how much the government would rather have an uneducated populace

(less likely since it seems to me a better educated populace would create economic strength in the future)

Indeed. (You only have to look at the ethnic population here to see how important they see education, and how nice it is to live in a neighbourhood where people want to learn and your not viewed as some kind of weirdo at the local collage because your interests go beyond the local football results. (It was actually a joy to chat with 'immigrants' from Afganistan who had a world class education in maths and was helpful, polite, with good English, and nothing like the rest of the trash in the country I'd bumped into practically my whole life..))

> There isn't really a way to tell

From what I can gather, its a money saving reason, and stupidity in the admin side of things resulting in the dumbing down. (A sort of catch 22 as the people they employ are themselves more stupid than the ones they replace, so the cycle keeps going down..)

> fighting for a better education system is something very much worth doing

Agreed very much so.

I would love to be able to build schools and colleges that excel at that kind of thing and can begin to churn out the educated people the world really needs right now.

> I dont give much of a fuck lately about peoples opinions

This word 'opinion' I reckon it crept into use from the TZM forums, as I've not really seen it used so much elsewhere.

Opinion is like, "I like blue wallpaper and orange flavoured icecream'

But, since TZM days, its come to mean what people say they have experienced in their lives, it appears as if there is a need to devalue peoples understanding of the world to mean nothing at all.

Its like science without the paperwork..

Is ones theory any less true the moment before you put ink to paper than after ?

If Cj (And from what I can gather listening to him talk elsewhere..) says things are like this and that, based on his wide experience in those particular fields, I'm very inclined to believe him and take note of what he says.

The same as if a plumber tells me that particular part of a broken toilet needs replacing, its more than just his opinion.

I guess they have got bored of playing with me and now its CJ's turn to be todays ham on the shelf.

> Nanos just really doesn't like fat people it seems.

Oh goodie someone remembered me!

Only some fat people, on the whole I would say I have more fat friends than slim/skinny friends, yes real friends!

But its no use having fat friends working for you when you could have someone more productive to start with so your fat friends can join in later once they have built paradise..

If one waits too long they will all have died off :-) :-(

Perhaps its nothing to do with CJ, maybe its because it looks too much like PJ and people are so easily confused at times.. (Especially if prone to the odd illegal substance so known to make us so much smarter than joe average..)

#33 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
CyborgJesusPosted: Aug 04, 2010 - 03:07
(0)
 

Level: 6
CS Original

I thought he was trying to say that stupid people are more easily governed and more easily manipulated into buying shit, and that therefore the government and corporations do not promote critical thinking.

Yup, that's what I argued so far.

"superstition ? how what is so that capitalism can create a credulous belief or notion, not based on reason or knowledge. How can something that is merely a system of transferring resources about via medium create this ?"

You're right when you're trying to say that "Capitalism" is pretty imprecise, but I think it's pretty easy to expand this to all positions of power inside capitalism - whether it's money or a position of political power.

You have the motivation for businesses to change the perceived value of their goods by using manipulative marketing, as well as by changing how their business is perceived - calling it "green" or simulating awareness for the environment, while engaging in environmentally destructive activities.

You have the motivation for governments to preserve their power and gain public interest for policies that might not even benefit the parts of the public that support them - to me, getting masses of poor guys support low tax for the rich, because it's re-framed as "freedom" is one of the greatest works of propaganda ever. If you include patriotism, and the belief that countries hate you because of your freedom, you have superstition. I could expand to government/business and religion, but I'll pass for now.

In Germany, you have a government saving policy which was basically waved through during the WM, while everyone's partying.
You have the FDP (free market oriented party) creating a massive political campaign for a lower sales tax on catering after receiving over a million euros in donations from the industry leader - they've already reframed themselves from "corrupt" to "clientele oriented" and now just let the issue slide w/o.

If the general public were highly skeptical of everything government and business does - this would make the work of these people much harder, wouldn't it?

While everyone seems to agree that other political systems use propaganda, we seem to be blind for our own - although we luckily still have the freedom to talk about it.

Likewise not only because it's easier to sell to and govern simple people, how can you say that using superstition and propaganda is easier to control stupid people?

I never used stupid, I don't think that has much to do with it. If I had to work the whole day on minimum wage, being stressed out by debt or fear of job loss and come home to my family, I wouldn't read books on government manipulation, I'd watch a simple show on TV that makes me feel good.
I'm not saying these are the only people subject to this process, not do I say all of them fall for it.

Do you know how many people have PhD's and are all part of the capitalist system and beleive that its function works perfectly?
Do you have the tenacity to call these people stupid, easily controllable, superstitious ?

I'm not calling anyone stupid, and just because you're not easily controllable doesn't mean you aren't. We all fall for some BS, I'm no exception. I might actually be a pretty bad example, when you watch me shopping. If a PhD would somehow defend people against propaganda, you wouldn't have scientists supporting Nazi Germany. It might increase your own capacity for critical thinking or show that you're able and willing to do so - but it doesn't mean you don't have superstitions or can't be manipulated.

Thanks for giving an actual argument, I appreciate it.
CJ

#34 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]