Hate Mail - Article: Scientific American: Babies are not tabula rasa or blank slates
| Sender: | Sugarcane "Ed" Gray <ed@sugarcane.es> |
| Subject: | Article: Scientific American: Babies are not tabula rasa or blank slates |
| Type: | Corrections |
| Added: | Jun 15, 2011 |
| Sent to: | Editing Committee |
I wanted to register but your website wouldn't allow me because it's "full"...
Anyhow, just wanted to point out, an article on your site linked to a Scientific American article is oddly titled: Scientific American: Babies are not tabula rasa or blank slates
I just wanted to point out that the article this links to in no way claims that babies are not "tabula rusa". In fact, it has very little, if anything, to do with this concept whatsoever.
Not particularly honest, if you ask me. Like a lot of the content on your site, it is poorly researched and based on misunderstanding of scientific topics.
Ed
Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Hello,
Thanks for the email.
I don't actually make a newsletter. But I'd love a login to your site if at all possible.
Thanks,
Ed
[ I guess he doesn't understand sarcasm? In any case, the site isn't "full", not sure what he's talking about. - Roxette ]