Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Senate Can't Pass Tax Cuts, But It Can Raise Penalties On Pot Brownies

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to Politics | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 30, 2010 - 14:45
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

If you thought that the Republican filibuster of the tax-cutting small business bill meant that the Senate didn't have a particularly productive day Thusday, you'd be wrong. In fact, the Senate authorized the issuance of a conservation stamp, created Polycystic Kidney Disease Awareness Week, gave a little money to the Patent and Trademark office and, oh yeah, doubled the penalties for making pot brownies. Yes, the same week that Congress significantly reduced the racially-charged crack-powder sentencing disparity, they also voted to create one between pot brownies and dime bags.

The Senate voted to pass by unanimous consent (that it, without a roll call vote) S. 258, known colloquially as the Saving Kids From Dangerous Drugs Act of 2010, introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and co-sponsored by Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Charles Grassley (R-IA). While the bill is intended to keep drug dealers from cutting their product with sweets in order to make them more marketable to children, it applies to any drug mixed with with something that modifies its flavor -- as making pot brownies does -- if the person making the brownies "intends" to give it to someone under 18. At that point, the person making the pot brownies would be subject to twice the normal penalty of any person caught distributing weed.

Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/senate-cant-pass-tax-cuts-but-it-can-raise-penalties-on-pot-brownies.php?ref=tn

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Jul 30, 2010 - 14:48
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

Ah shit, gotta shut down my secret kitchen.

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]