Skeptic Project

Nanos wrote [ here ]:

> It doesn't mean cheaper products because that company now has
> to divert funds to building and running completely unprofitable
> farms. That will cancel out the cost savings from lower salaries
> completely.

Why would the farms be unprofitable ?

Instead of people paying for food from someone else who is adding profit on top of the cost of producing said food, it can be produced in house at the same cost and sold at cost, thus providing people with cheaper food.

Selling at cost = no profit = unprofitable. At best the company might break even, but I don't see how it would lower costs in any way overall.

I thought that building chained to his solar car was his house.

Thanks for edit, mod