Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Why is a unified Earth bad?

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to Politics | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 13:57
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Not so much a NWO, but a worldwide cooperation and sharing of sovereignty, much like EU and newly made Union of South American Nations, is what I contemplate supporting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_American_Union</p>

Discuss.

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:03
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Because I can't even get along with my idiot neighbors. What makes you think I could ever get along with someone from a completely different culture?

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:13
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Hard nosed question, I was expecting questions about government or just how much sovereignty would be shared.

Also, certain people are much more willing than you Matt.

I could be wrong, but I have a hunch that it's very popular in South America.

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
MuertosPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:14
(0)
 

Paid Disinformation Blogger

Level: 14
CS Original

I think a unified Earth would be great, but I don't think it's ever going to happen.

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Sil the ShillPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:16
(0)
 

Level: 9
CS Original

I always found it interesting how those in favor of a unified Earth think it's never going to happen, and those who fear the idea always think it's right around the corner.

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:18
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Perhaps both extremes are being too pessimistic about their expectations.

Let's try to look at this rationally and methodically.

Okay, UNASUR is just beginning, what are its potential benefits? And the obstacles it faces?

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:22
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Also, certain people are much more willing than you Matt."

Yeah, and certain people are even less willing than I am and they're armed to the teeth. I have no rabid nationalistic fervor to my disagreement, I just think its silly.

So where does that leave the idea?

#7 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:27
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

It leaves the idea heavily depending on how many powerful people being for or against the idea.

Example 1: Canada, Mexico, USA: Highly unlikely.

Example 2: The South American Nations: Working heavily towards making UNASUR a firm reality, although many countries have yet to observe it.

#8 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:28
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Interesting. Venezuela has joined the UNASUR.

One would think Chavez would do something about all the slums in his own capital before trying to change the continent.

The question I have is: Why should I take the UNASUR seriously?

#9 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:30
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Every country there has slums, Venezuela is no exception.

South America is pulling itself out of its poverty shithole.

They're hoping UNASUR will help speed up the process, probably by promoting trade and increased travel, tourism etc.

#10 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:32
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Why is UNASUR relevant to this discussion? Its an organization to lift nations out of poverty.

#11 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:37
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

True, but probably not the only thing it's aiming for.

Mainly because if UNASUR becomes as powerful and influential as the EU, it would raise questions to the rest of the world if increased prosperity can be obtained by following Europe and S. America's example.

Perhaps Asia would follow suit, and Africa (although Africa would have a much harder time even getting to South America's current point).

But you're more than welcome to include something else for the discussion Matt. :)

#12 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:40
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"But you're more than welcome to include something else for the discussion Matt. :) "

Well, I would point to the United Nations. But they're so inept at everything they do that it wouldn't be a very good example for being a unified earth proponent.

Again, I'm not opposed to the idea of a unified earth. I just don't think its a remotely reasonable goal.

#13 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:44
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Which is exactly why you would need to piece it together, bit by bit.

The U.N tried to assemble everyone, and they got a whole lot of noise.

What timeframe are working towards Matt? I think it's possible, but probably not going to be a reality until many decades from now. Or do you think it'll never happen?

#14 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:48
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I don't think it will ever happen. Tribal groups are just part of who we are. Even if you unite all the tribes who don't want to wage war, what do you do with the ones who do? You can't rally all the pacifist tribes to take out even one of the violent tribes.

But that doesn't mean we can't stop invading the other tribes, and that does not require a unified earth to accomplish.

#15 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:53
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

You talk as if we're just like Africa. O_o

You're right about being 'tribal' in a sense.

Just because one tribe cooperates with another doesn't mean they want to be called one and the same. Many people are proud of their "tribes'" uniqueness, and there's usually nothing wrong with that.

The one thing "tribes" would need to understand is not to harbor elitism, resentment etc. towards each other. Is that easy? No. Is it appropriate? Absolutely.

#16 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 14:58
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

So you're saying I shouldn't show resentment towards a tribe that has no interest in anything but war and conquest at my expense?

What would prevent it from happening again if I did not?

#17 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:06
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Education. There's a popular saying;

"Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it."

Hmm, I haven't considered that scenario.
On the other hand, "tribes" hellbent on war and conquest usually fail miserably and end up being universally reviled. (Nazi regime)

#18 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:07
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

What if the other tribe's uniqueness is their ability to effectively wage war and conquer other tribes?

But the Nazis are not universally reviled, as there are plenty of things like the Aryan Nations and Neo-Nazis who view the Nazis as heroes.

#19 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:14
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Ouch, then one would have to observe the effects of their regime.
The Nazis had a very oppressive regime, and they also had a very effective war machine (initially), along with powerful allies (like Japan).
Alas, their efforts for total domination failed, largely because most other "tribes" felt the need to unite, work together and topple them.

An unlikely scenario you present, but one that would need to be considered nonetheless.

By universally reviled I meant reviled by most people outside of a few small isolated pockets, (failure of wording to convey my meaning on my part, sorry, I was aware of Neo-Nazis and such)

#20 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:16
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> unified earth

Don't we have it already, after all, we here are from all over the place, and we manage to get on well enough don't we.. ?

#21 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:16
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

But who gets more attention, the isolated pockets or the mass indifferents who neither worship nor revile the Nazis?

#22 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:17
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Don't we have it already, after all, we here are from all over the place, and we manage to get on well enough don't we.. ?"

No... this is a message board. Not a unified earth.

#23 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
CyborgJesusPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:18
(0)
 

Level: 6
CS Original

As long as the participating countries don't see a direct benefit from it, it won't happen. So I think the probability of a "unified" earth is pretty low - even the funds for helping the third world turn out to be either bribes or economic sabotage, with a very little bit of actual charity left over.

My belief that anything positive for the world as a whole will come out of strategic conquest, whether economic or military, is rather limited.

#24 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:21
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

The pockets are very vocal, and the indifferents aren't inclined to be vocal at all, so the former.

There's a point here, but what is it exactly Matt?

@Nanos

One could also argue that we are splintered because of our armed forces and wars.
Certain Shiite and Sunni Muslims can't even come to terms peacefully.

#25 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:22
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Omni

The point was that the Nazis are not universally reviled, as there are many who are indifferent towards the Nazis period. I think the point was that the isolated pockets have more power to attract attention and get their message out than the mass of those who are indifferent. Or something. I don't know Nanos threw my train of thought off the rails with his crazy ramblings.

#26 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:31
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Very true.
That's why you spread the historical information about the Nazis. I doubt that anyone outside of certain WASP's would welcome their beliefs after learning them.

@CyborgJesus
Absolutely true
Which is why people have to see the benefits of cooperation, which would depend on the parties who cooperate.
Example: UNASUR is very supported by every sovereign nation (except France) in S. America because they all want to drag themselves out of poverty. EU promotes economic growth, and UNASUR could do the same.

#27 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:33
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"That's why you spread the historical information about the Nazis."

It already makes up like 98% of The History Channel's programming. I don't think there's much more you can do.

#28 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:34
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Oh, come on, History Channel isn't broadcast everywhere.

Modern Marvels is, not anti Nazi programming. :3

#29 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 19, 2010 - 15:36
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

World War 2 is covered in grade school history class. What more could you do?

#30 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]